Abstract
Scientific knowledge has always depended on images, especially when it addresses phenomena that escape direct sensory perception. This introduction sketches the privileged yet problematic role of animation in figuring the “invisible” within contemporary science communication, pointing out some connected epistemological and ethical questions. In fact, the increasing visual coherence, realism, and interactivity of animated models can obscure the constructed nature of scientific models, encouraging audiences to read them as direct depictions rather than as mediated arguments. The present special issue of Mutual Images Journal is related to the Marie Skłodowska-Curie project FICTA SciO – Figuring the Invisible (2023–2025), which investigated conventions and tactics of animation for science outreach while advocating transparency as a core communicative value. The introduction outlines the conceptual stakes of the project and presents the seven contributions as complementary inquiries into how animation shapes scientific understanding, visibility, and public trust within contemporary visual culture.
References
Banner, O., & Ostherr, K. (2015). Design in Motion: Introducing Science/Animation. Discourse, 37(3), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.13110/discourse.37.3.0175
Bissonnette, S. (2014). Scalar Travel Documentaries: Animating the Limits of the Body and Life. Animation, 9(2), 138–158.
Buchan, S. (Ed.). (2013). Pervasive Animation. New York: Routledge.
Campbell, V. (2016). Science, Entertainment and Television Documentary. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cook, M., Cowan, M., & Curtis, S. (2023). Useful Animation: Iconography, Infrastructure and Impact. Animation, 18(3), 196–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/17468477231207613
Curtis, S. (2015). The Shape of Spectatorship: Art, Science, and Early Cinema in Germany. New York: Columbia University Press.
Curtis, S. (2021). Animated Images in a Media History of Science. Journal of Cinema and Media Studies, 61(1), 147–152.
Curtis, S., & Lue, R. (2018). Bridging Science, Art, and the History of Visualization: A Dialogue. Animation, 13(3), 215–229.
Daston, L., & Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Davelaar, J., Bronzwaer, T., Kok, D., Younsi, Z., Mościbrodzka, M., & Falcke, H. (2018). Observing supermassive black holes in virtual reality. Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology, 5, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40668-018-0023-7
Honess Roe, A. (2013). Animated Documentary. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968 [1964]). The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Mitchell, W. J. T. (2015). Image Science: Iconology, Visual Culture, and Media Aesthetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Popper, K. (2005). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge.
Russett, R. (2004). Animated Sound and Beyond. American Music, 22(1), 110–121.
van Dijck, J. (2006). Picturizing Science: The Science Documentary as Multimedia Spectacle. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 9(1), 5–24.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Marco Bellano